Posts Tagged settle

Funding Retirement Or Paying Off Debt?

Posted by Power User on Thursday, 7 January, 2010

debtretirement 150x150 Funding Retirement Or Paying Off Debt?It is a common dilemma when one must decide if they should stop funding their retirement to focus on paying off debt.  There are very few circumstances where high interest or interest of 9%-12% debt shouldn’t be top priority.  Double digit interest is very difficult to deal with.  If you are dealing with high interest debt, it’s most likely because you haven’t been living within your means.

If we are able to get our interest rate down in to the single digits, we must decide if it is a good time to make retirement a priority or not.  If you decide to fund retirement, you stay in debt longer and pay more interest.

There are a couple other situations where investing may make sense. Consider the following:

First, you only have a specific limit per year that you can contribute to a Roth IRA. (This is currently $5,000 per year — $6,000 per year if you’re 50 or older.) Once you miss the window of availability, you’re out of luck. Your new contributions go toward the current year’s limit. You can’t go back and make up contributions you missed for the past two years once you are out of debt.

Second, if you don’t have the discipline to actually apply any new money to accelerate your progress on debt, then don’t halt your retirement. Decreasing your contributions only to spend the difference at *your vice of choice* may be the single dumbest financial move you can make.

There’s no single answer to this dilemma.

Everyone’s situation is different.  Consider all your options. Don’t continue making a certain decision just because it’s what you’re doing right now.

Start from a blank slate. Could you benefit from a singular focus? Are you willing to make further lifestyle cuts to increase you current contributions?  Examine your options and consider the choices.


Critics Doubt Latest Jobs Bill Will Really Produce Jobs

Posted by Power User on Monday, 4 January, 2010

jobs1 150x150 Critics Doubt Latest Jobs Bill Will Really Produce JobsWhen the Senate takes up a jobs bill later this month or early in February, the debate will center on whether it really will create jobs and be worth plunging the government tens of billions of dollars further into debt.

Republicans scoff at the “Jobs for Main Street Act” title that House Democrats put on their $174 billion package last month. They refer to it as “son of the stimulus,” the $787 billion economic recovery plan of nearly a year ago that they say was ineffective at producing jobs.

In its last vote of 2009, the House narrowly passed the bill, 217-212, without a single Republican supporter.

Democrats tick off the job prospects from the House bill’s $75 billion in infrastructure and public sector spending: tens of thousands of new construction jobs, 5,500 more police officers, 25,000 additional AmeriCorps members, 250,000 summer jobs for disadvantaged youth, 14,000 part-time jobs for parks and forestry workers.

“Why don’t we just put everyone in the United States on the federal government payroll and call it a day?” counters Rep. Jerry Lewis, R-Calif.

House Democrats diverted $75 billion from the Wall Street bailout fund to offset some of the costs. Opponents said that amounted to a shell game because unused bailout money is supposed to be used to reduce the deficit, which hit $1.4 trillion in the 2009 budget year.

The Senate, however, has less of an appetite for another costly round of economic stimulus measures, particularly with a vote on tap for Jan. 20 to again raise the ceiling on the government’s total debt just a month after upping it to $12.4 trillion.

Conspicuously absent from the House plan were President Obama’s proposals to attack unemployment through tax credits for small businesses that create jobs and for homeowners who make their dwellings more energy efficient.

A job-creating tax credit for small businesses has support among some Democrats in the Senate, even though critics fear it may be too complex to work.

“Small business people have too much to do just to keep their businesses afloat to try and figure out some fancy, complex credit,” Lawrence Lindsey, an economic adviser to former President George W. Bush, told a Democratic panel last month.

But Gene Sperling, an adviser to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, said tax credits would empower growing small businesses.

“If these have even a marginal incentive on even a few … employers, the bang for the buck in terms of job creation would be one of the highest of any of the types of incentives that we’ve had,” Sperling said.

The job creation issue is complicated. Much of the money in the House bill goes to programs that may stimulate the economy but don’t appear to directly put people to work.

There’s $41 billion to extend unemployment benefits for six months and $12.3 billion to extend a health insurance subsidy for people who have lost their jobs. There’s extension of a child tax credit for poor families, $23.5 billion to help states cover Medicaid costs and $23 billion so states can support some 250,000 education jobs over the next two years. An additional $2.8 billion goes to clean water and environmental restoration projects.

Even the investment in “shovel-ready” highway and bridge projects may not immediately translate into a reduction in the nation’s 10 percent unemployment rate.

Republicans cited government figures showing that, as of Sept. 30, only 9 percent of $27.5 billion for highways in the first stimulus bill had been spent. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that of the $39 billion in the new House jobs bill directed to the departments of Transportation and Housing and Urban Development, only $1.7 billion will get spent before next October.

A lot of the money “hasn’t even gotten out of Washington yet,” said Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia, the House’s second-ranked Republican. “Why is it still here if it was designed to create jobs?”

Rep. James Oberstar, D-Minn., chairman of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, said some 8,000 highway and transit projects — more than half those designated under last February’s stimulus bill — are under way, creating or sustaining 210,000 direct jobs. When indirect jobs are included, that number reaches 630,000, he said.

The low federal spending rate, committee officials said, is because the treasury outlay comes at the end of the process, after the contractor bills the state and the state bills Washington.

Dan DuBray, spokesman for the Interior Department’s Bureau of Reclamation, said his agency will have no problem putting to work the $100 million it would receive under the jobs bill to provide clean drinking water to rural areas. “Projects in Reclamation are much akin to planes waiting on the taxiway waiting to take off.”

Matt Jeanneret, spokesman for the American Road and Transportation Builders Association, agreed that “a lot of jobs” have been saved by the stimulus act, although in many cases federal money is basically replacing lower levels of private or state investment. The unemployment rate in the construction industry remains at about 19 percent, almost double the national level.

The stimulus is “a needed shot in the arm, but the real solution is a long-term highway and transit investment bill,” Jeanneret said. Congress has put off consideration of a six-year $450 billion infrastructure measure to replace the highway and transit act that expired in September.

The CBO has estimated that employment was 600,000 to 1.6 million higher in the third quarter of 2009 because of the stimulus act.

Source: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/01/03/critics-doubt-latest-jobs-really-produce-jobs/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Fpolitics+%2528Text+-+Politics%2529


Do You Have High Credit Card Balances?

Posted by Power User on Wednesday, 23 December, 2009

Money Keeps Pouring in Despite Tax Cuts 7660841 150x150 Do You Have High Credit Card Balances?If you owe a lot of money to a few credit card companies and can’t pay it off so fast, there are still some steps you could take to protect yourself.

Make an effort to pay off your credit cards as soon as possible.  Cut back on expenses and luxuries so you have extra cash to pay off your credit cards.  stop using your credit cards to live beyond your means and start paying them off.  Stop using the card and start paying it off.

Prevent them from claiming they received a late payment.  All the major credit card companies gain profits from collecting late fees, so they have a reason to trick you into paying later. They love to prey on customers who carry big balances. A common tactic is to move your due date and hope you won’t notice.  And despite the fact that their paying processing centers operate 24 hours a day, seven day a week, most credit card companies won’t post payments received after 1:00 p.m. or on weekends. 

You can sidestep this trick by always examining the due date when your statement arrives and paying your bill electronically.  Your bank probably offers an electronic bill paying service (make sure it’s free), you can also make payment directly at many credit card websites. At the time this article is being written, you can pay Citibank, MBNA, Capital One, Bank of America and hundreds of other creditors via Paypal just by clicking a button, and it costs you nothing.  All you have to do is register with Paypal, confirm your bank account and you’re set to go.  When you pay electronically, you have an electronic receipt indicating the date the payment was sent and received as proof that the payment was made on time. 

Put all billing disputes in writing.  Credit card companies want to communicate with you exclusively by telephone so they can deny receiving your call later on, if necessary. Even if you write them a letter, they will respond by phone.  If you have a dispute with them, it is very important that you don’t call them, instead, put it in writing and send it certified mail, return receipt requested and request that they communicate with you only by letter.  You need the written proof to fight them.  Those who fight them with letters often get late fees and such removed.  

Pay all of your bills on time. Some of the major credit card issuers monitor your credit report for negative activity. If they find late payment notations or written off accounts, etc., they will boost your interest rate dramatically.  Almost all of the major credit card companies use this tactic — they raise people’s rates from 7% to 28% just like that when they find a late payment or a high debt ratio on a credit report!  If you don’t want your interest rate quadrupled, keep your credit score high, pay your bills on time, and don’t accumulate too much debt.

Don’t just pay the minimum due each month.  If you have a large balance and pay only the minimum on a credit card for many months in a row, some banks will raise your interest rate significantly.  Try to pay at least $30 more than the minimum each month to avoid their wrath.  Even if you’re struggling with debt, it would be a good idea to make a few large lump sum payments at least twice a year to indicate that you do have some cash to pay down the debt — send them at least three or four times more than the minimum required.

A warning to those struggling with debt — Most debt counselors recommend that you focus on paying off one credit card at a time.  They advise you to apply all your extra cash to one credit card while paying only the minimum due on all other credit cards.  But this can have very serious consequences if those companies to whom you are paying only the minimum raise your interest rate because you have been paying only the minimum for a very long time.  If your rate is raised from 15% to 28%, it’s going to take you so much longer to pay off that credit card.  

A better alternative is to pay down all the cards at once by sending in at least $10 more than the minimum due each month, but ideally, at least $30 more than the minimum due each month on each credit card to keep your rate from being increased.  And, if you have any extra cash left over after that, you can use it to concentrate on paying off a specific credit card. 

Complain, complain, complain.  Credit card companies get away with all of the above because too few consumers complain to their state and federal elected officials.  If your senator received hundreds of letters from consumers threatening to vote him out of office in the next election if he doesn’t stop taking money from the banking industry and enact regulating legislation as soon as possible, you can be sure he would do something to keep his job and his fat salary and benefits.  Links are below.